2007!
This was the year after I began watching all of the nominees (before
that I had only focused on the winners), and so it was the first year
where I had watched all of the nominees before the actual ceremony. I
did this by attending the showing of the Oscar nominated animated shorts
sponsored by Shorts HQ/Shorts International. I was actually able to
find four of the five nominees before the event, but one of the nominees
was nowhere to be found online, which led to my sister and me going
into Washington DC. It was well worth it, as even the shorts that I had
seen looked a lot more dazzling on the big screen.
---------------------------------------------------
I Met the Walrus
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aa57/3aa57eed273b9518cd5622fc1613a5a433302a82" alt=""
"In
1969, the 14-year-old Jerry Levitan, armed with a reel-to-reel tape
recorder, snuck into John Lennon's hotel room for a chat." Almost 40
years later, he took some of the footage and produced this short film.
There isn't much in this film in terms of plot. Rather, it serves as a
vehicle to get into the head of one of the most significant musicians of
our time, almost 30 years after his death. The short is presented in a
very unique style. Young Levitan is presented as a marionette with a
tape recorder, while Lennon's answers are presented visually,
transitioning seamlessly with every word. For example, when Lennon says,
"A lot of people don't want me in, you know, they think I'm gonna cause
a violent revolution," a row of silhouetted people appear, the heads of
one of them pop open revealing a soldier on a horse carrying a sword.
The art style is eclectic, featuring photographs, original animation,
old illustrations, and silhouettes. It is very dynamic style that I wish
would be used more often. Unfortunately, I don't find the interview to
be very interesting, so even though the film is only five minutes long, I
was waiting for it to finish four minutes in.
Madame Tutli-Putli
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e58d/7e58d0afa438d842a8ea055959e6257e08aa785d" alt=""
Madame
Tutli-Putli tells the story of the titular character, weighted down by
all of her material possessions, taking a train trip to an unknown
destination. She meets a cast of quirky characters on the train. But
when the train stops for the night, a band of mysterious figures attack
the train. Madame Tutli-Putli runs throughout the train, but it is only
at the head of the train can she find peace. This film was lauded for
its brilliant stop-motion animation, and it is truly dazzling,
highlighted by the innovative technique of using composite human eyes
for the puppets' eyes. The character movement are also much smoother
than that of many other stop motion works. However, the story is where
the film falls apart. The film is filled to the brim with metaphors, to
the point where it becomes strenuous to watch. The first half of the
film is decent, with a mix of humor and suspense, but the metaphors
reach an excess in the second half, and it becomes strenuous to watch.
And when you finally grasp what the film is trying to say, it becomes
painfully similar to Bunny, the Oscar winning film from 1998. And
considering the work that was put into this film, that is really too
bad.
Même les Pigeons vont au Paradis (Even Pigeons Go to Heaven)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3f4b/c3f4b22fed805f3821f9915f2c455f893faa2e7e" alt=""
A
priest intercepts a call and hurries to an old man's house, knocking
another driver heading to the same destination off the road. He sees the
old man falling off a haphazard pile while reaching for an old red sock
stuffed with money and saves him. Then he presents the purpose of the
visit: to sell the old man a pass to heaven. Like The Lady and the
Reaper from 2009, this French film attempts to tackle a profound topic
with humor. The former was about the right to die.This one is about the
best way to attain salvation. Christians were taught that Jesus Christ
is "the way and the truth and the light. No one comes to the Father
except through [him]" (John 14:6). Using works or in the case of this
short, monetary payments to attain salvation is an example of
corruption. This is an important lesson for Christians. So even though
this film seems lightweight on the outside, it packs quite a wallop, at
least for me. The humor makes it accessible for everyone else.
Moya lyubov (My Love)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a5a4/2a5a40955349daff65752e8a43ffa6e65137260d" alt=""
Aleksandr
Petrov has become somewhat of a legend in the animation world. He is
best known for his use of paint-of-glass technique, where he uses his
fingers to modify oil points on a glass canvas, resulting in a style
resembling a moving oil painting. My Love, his most recent film, tells
the tale of a 16-year-old boy as he struggles with his first romantic
feelings, split between his family's passionate servant, and a
mysterious beauty that hides a major secret. His conflicting emotions
begin to tear him apart. The animation is stunning, as is the case for
all of Petrov's films. And like most of his other films, he visually
depicts a character's thoughts. However, while he does it only a few
times in the past and in only major scenes, it seems as though half of the shots are the main
character's fantasies. While the fantasies are fitting considering the
film's romantic themes, at some points it becomes very difficult to
distinguish between reality and fantasy. However, that is a minor
quibble. I found the story to be very engaging, and ultimately quite
powerful.
Peter & the Wolf
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e14ed/e14ed8212063aa9d92fd3a8d721f20a1b7a992e3" alt=""
Peter
& the Wolf is Sergei Prokofiev's famous musical composition. It
tells the story of young Peter who goes out on an adventure with his
animal friends while a wild wolf is on the loose. It is significant in
that each character is represented by its own instrument. This version
has generally the same story, except the story is transported into
contemporary Russia, and it is told without a narrator, making it
different from most other versions. I am somewhat conflicted about this
version. I grew up with the Disney version of the made during the 1940s,
and it is impossible not to make a comparison between the two. This
version is objectively much better than the Disney version. It is near
masterpiece from a technological standpoint. The stop-motion animation
may not be at the same level as Madame Tutli-Putli, but it is still
incredibly smooth and vibrant. And at 32 minutes it is one of the
longest nominated films in the award's 80-year history. The storytelling
is also superior to the Disney version, telling the story using only
images. Many of the characters are also charming and likable, from
Peter's silently loyal duck friend to the morbidly obese cat heck bent
on eating the bird and adding to his calorie count. However, despite all
this, I think I prefer the Disney version of the tale, mostly due to
this verison's slow pacing and length. That's not to say this version
isn't great, but it's far from my favorite nominee of the year.
------------------------------------------------------
This was my first year of watching the nominees before the actual ceremony, and I wasn't exactly sure what to expect. There was no doubt in my mind that
My Love was my favorite nominee from this year. It was deep and fantastic, but would that translate into a victory? I was hoping so but I wasn't so sure. I was thinking maybe
Madame Tutli-Putli because of its innovative techniques, and the age-old belief that the film you disliked the most would go on to win. Well, it didn't go that way in this category this year (although it did for Best Original Song, which went to "Falling Slowly" from
Once. I wrote in my Oscars Live Blog, "I don't really like this song. It's probably going to win."). However, it also didn't go to
My Love either. Instead, it went to
Peter & the Wolf. That was somewhat of a surprise, but from a technological and a storytelling
standpoint I've got no quibbles with the win.
My rankings (by quality)
Moya lyubov > Peter & the Wolf > Madame Tutli-Putli > Even Pigeons Go to Heaven > I Met the Walrus
My rankings (by preference)
Moya lyubov > Even Pigeons Go to Heaven > Peter & the Wolf > I Met the Walrus > Madame Tutli-Putli
I did this by attending the showing of the Oscar nominated animated shorts sponsored by Shorts HQ/Shorts International. I was actually able to find four of the five nominees before the event, but one of the nominees was nowhere to be found online, which led to my sister and me going into Washington DC. It was well worth it, as even the shorts that I had seen looked a lot more dazzling on the big screen.
ReplyDeleteA shame nobody in Toledo, OH does this.
The usual complaint I often recall about Peter & The Wolf from those who saw it was in how it treated the ending in a way that was certainly very contemporary and possible as a reaction to the sensibilities and concern for animal rights we have today. It should also be pointed out the film was a co-production between British and Polish studios, and quite a unique collaboration as well, I did not mind the wordless adaptation of the story itself as I often felt he music and the visuals were fine on their own (not to say Sterling Holloway's narration on the Disney version wasn't that bad either but they both work in their own way).